Conference Committees
Meet our distinguished committee members ensuring conference excellence and scientific rigor
Organizing Committee
Dedicated professionals managing conference logistics and operations
Program Committee
Experts managing scientific program development and academic quality
Technical Support Group
Dedicated team ensuring smooth technical operations and conference logistics
Review Committee
Experts ensuring rigorous peer review and quality assessment
Peer Review Process
Review Criteria
- Scientific novelty and significance
- Technical quality and methodology
- Clarity of presentation
- Relevance to conference themes
Review Timeline
- Initial review: 2-3 weeks
- Author revisions: 1 week
- Final decision: 1 week
- Total process: 4-5 weeks
Double-blind review process ensures fair and unbiased evaluation of all submissions